back next next
Table of Contents
Index
Glossary










































Table of Contents
Index
Glossary
back next next

Next: Scientific discourse relations Up: Links Previous: General guidelines for links

  
Organisational relations

Identify the organisational relations between modules, of which at least one is part of the article at hand. Express these organisational relations in links and present these links in the Map of contents and in the navigation menu of each of the modules. The different labels that can be associated to organisational relations are summarised in figure A.3

The purpose of organisational relations is to identify the module's organisational context in the article and in larger collections of modules. The modules can be consulted separately, without their context in the article. Hence, organisational relations do not have to be made explicit in the text of the module itself. If, however, a link is given in the text to represent a scientific discourse relation between particular relata, that link should also express any organisational relations that can be identified between the corresponding relata, which implies that the link is characterised by the labels associated to these organisational relations as well (see above for the correspondence of the source and target of the link, and the relata of the relations it can express).

1. Hierarchical relations (Is part of, Contains)  

Notation: The link `S Contains Is part of T' is denoted in the text of S as [link type: (Contains); target: T], meaning ``the current module S contains module T'', and in the text of T as [link type: (Is part of); target: S], meaning ``the current module T is part of the module S''.
Example: `A05-m2 contains part of A05-m2b': The compound module Positioning A05-m2 contains the module Central problem and reversely, the elementary module Central Problem is part of the Positioning.

2. Proximity-based relations (Article, Project, External)  
A proximity-based relation indicates whether the connected modules are close to each other: are they part of different works or of the same work? Make this type of relation explicit between modules that are connected by a link created for the purpose of expressing another type of relation.

3. Range-based relations (To wider range, To narrower range)  

Notation: The link `S To wider range To narrower range T' is denoted in the text of S as [link type: (to wider ranger); target: T], meaning ``the information in module T has a wider range than the information in the module S'', and in the text of T [link type: (To narrower range); target: S] means ``the module S has a narrower range than the information in the module T''.
Example: Mesoscopic modules have a wider range than microscopic modules, so that `A05-m3a To wider To narrower MESO-m3a', where A05-m3a provides the article-specific information on the actual measurements performed at this time and MESO-m3a the information about the set-up, which plays a role in the research project as a whole.

    
[To the full figure] Figure A.3: The different types of labels associated to the organisational relations.

4. Administrative relations (To contents, To meta-information) 
Make explicit the administrative relations between, on the one hand, the module Meta-information and its constituents, and, on the other hand, the `scientific' content modules:

Notation: The link `S To meta-information To contents T' is denoted in the text of S as [link type: (to meta-information); target: T], meaning ``the meta-information of the current module S is provided in module T'', and in the text of T [link type: (to contents); target: S] means ``the information associated to the current meta-information module T is provided in the module S''.

5. Sequential relations 

5.1
Complete sequential path  (Sq-next, Sq-back)

Notation: A link `S Sq-next Sq-back T' is denoted in the text of S as [link type: (Sq-next); target: T], meaning ``following the complete sequential path, the next step from the current module S leads to module T'', and in the text of T as [link type: (Sq-back); target: S], meaning ``retracing steps from the current module T by way of the complete sequential path leads back to module S''.
Example: `A05-m2b Sq-next Sq-back A05-m3': Following the sequential path that we have established in the article, the next step along the complete sequential path after the module Central problem, leads to the Methods module.

5.2
Essay-type path  (Es-next, Es-back)

Notation: A link `S Es-next Es-back T' is denoted in the text of S as [link type: (Essay-next); target: T], meaning ``following the essay-type sequential path, the next step from the current module S leads to module T'', and in the text of T as [link type: (essay-back); target: S], meaning ``retracing steps from the current module T by way of the essay-type sequential path leads back to module S''.
Example: `A08-mb3c Es-next Es-back A08-m4bi': Following the essay-type sequential path, the next step along the complete sequential path after the module Experimental methods, leads to the Treated results module focusing on the experimental differential cross sections.

An editorial board can specify stringent rules for the essay-type path. They may require the author to either include or to exclude the Bibliographic information and the Map of contents. These decisions may also be left to the author's discretion.
\begin{14078}{</P>}
{<P>}\noindent\subsubsub{6. Representational relati...
...s connecting a textual representation, a figure and an animation).
\end{14078}
In the modularisation of the corpus articles, we have not identified representational relations, because neither we, nor the authors of the original articles, have represented the same information in different formats. The editorial board of a multimedia journal can specify rules for this `technical' type of relations.  


\begin{14079}\index{Scientific discourse relation\vert(}{</P>}
\end{14079}
 


back next next
Table of Contents
Index
Glossary










































Table of Contents
Index
Glossary
back next next

Next: Scientific discourse relations Up: Links Previous: General guidelines for links