This is a file in the archives of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Supplement to Common Knowledge


Proof of Proposition 2.5

Proposition 2.5.
omega in KmN(A) iff
(1) For all agents i1, i2, … , im in N, omega in Ki1Ki2Kim(A)
Hence, omega in K*N(A) iff (1) is the case for each m greater than or equal to 1.

Proof.
Note first that

( 2 ) intersection
i 1 in N
K i 1 ( intersection
i 2 in N
K i 2 ( . . . ( intersection
i m - 1 in N
K i m - 1 ( intersection
i m in N
K i m( A ) ) ) ) )

= intersection
i 1 in N
K i 1 ( intersection
i 2 in N
K i 2 ( . . . ( intersection
i m - 1 in N
K i m - 1 (K 1N ( A ) ) ) ) )

= intersection
i 1 in N
K i 1 ( intersection
i 2 in N
K i 2 . . . ( intersection
i m - 2 in N
K i m - 2 ( K 2N ( A ) ) ) )

= . . .

= intersection
i 1 in N
K i 1( K m - 1N ( A ) )

= K mN ( A )

By ( 2 ), K mN ( A ) subset K i 1K i 2 . . . K i m( A ) for i 1, i 2, . . ., i m in N so if omega in K mN ( A ) then condition ( 1 ) is satisfied. Condition ( 1 ) is equivalent to

omega in intersection
i 1 in N
K i 1 ( intersection
i 2 in N
K i 2 ( . . . ( intersection
i m - 1 in N
K i m - 1 ( intersection
i m in N
K i m ( A ) ) ) ) )

so by ( 2 ), if ( 1 ) is satisfied then omega in K mN ( A ). QED

Copyright © 2001 by
Peter Vanderschraaf
peterv@cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu

Return to Common Knowledge

First published: August 27, 2001
Content last modified: August 27, 2001